One Planet One People Please
Welcome to the Baha'i Answer Forum
Baha'i Answer Forum is not an Official Baha'i Website. The views expressed here are not 'Official' Baha'i views. The official Baha'i Website is found here - https://www.bahai.org/ - Thank you for becoming part of the Baha'i Answer Forum community.
Quote from: Truthseeker on Feb 05, 2023, 03:29 AMQuote from: jambun on Nov 24, 2022, 01:18 AMTo say that 'Abdu'l-Bahá got it right despite what is said by science just because of who he is seems to me downright dishonest. The points on which he disagrees are so fundamental and so basic that science just could not be mistaken. Just read an elementary Biology text book for High School students. If you learn that at school at age 16 then how much do Professors of evolutionary Biology know on the subject? You might as well question Einstein's theories of relativity and just say God is pushing things down rather than it being the curvature of the 4 dimensional space-time continuum.Another thing you should consider is this, a point I make by quoting Shoghi Effendi on another matter.
In this connection it is interesting to note the answer given by the beloved Guardian's secretary on his behalf to a question about the "fourth heaven" mentioned in the Kitáb-i-Íqán. The translation of the passage is as follows:
As to the ascent of Christ to the "fourth heaven" as revealed in the glorious Book of Íqán, he [the Guardian] stated that the "fourth heaven" is a term used and a belief held by the early astronomers. The followers of the Shí'ah sect likewise held this belief. As the Kitáb-i-Íqán was revealed for the guidance of that sect, this term was used in conformity with the concepts of its followers.
What this means is that some statements in Abdu'l-Baha's explanation about the significance of evolution with regard to man might be incorrect by today's science, but He used what was known then, which might be incorrect today, but was geared to the Baha'is then to show that man was different from animals in a qualitative way. The point still is that man and animals are different in that man has a soul while animals have an animal spirit, and only man has the potential to reflect all of the attributes of God as Baha'u'llah said. I don't know enough to know if on some points He was incorrect by today's science.
Quote from: jambun on Nov 24, 2022, 01:18 AMTo say that 'Abdu'l-Bahá got it right despite what is said by science just because of who he is seems to me downright dishonest. The points on which he disagrees are so fundamental and so basic that science just could not be mistaken. Just read an elementary Biology text book for High School students. If you learn that at school at age 16 then how much do Professors of evolutionary Biology know on the subject? You might as well question Einstein's theories of relativity and just say God is pushing things down rather than it being the curvature of the 4 dimensional space-time continuum.Another thing you should consider is this, a point I make by quoting Shoghi Effendi on another matter.
Quote from: Tony Bristow-Stagg on Nov 24, 2022, 05:51 PMAbdul'baha explains the evolution of man as a distinct species, in the context of the potentialof the spirit. I see Science is yet to explore the Spirit that is behind evolution.Sorry, I haven't checked in here for a long time, obviously.
Regards Tony
Quote from: jambun on Nov 24, 2022, 01:18 AMTo say that 'Abdu'l-Bahá got it right despite what is said by science just because of who he is seems to me downright dishonest. The points on which he disagrees are so fundamental and so basic that science just could not be mistaken. Just read an elementary Biology text book for High School students. If you learn that at school at age 16 then how much do Professors of evolutionary Biology know on the subject? You might as well question Einstein's theories of relativity and just say God is pushing things down rather than it being the curvature of the 4 dimensional space-time continuum.It's not dishonest to say that, just a honest different opinion of what Abdu'l-Baha meant. You could say that Abdu'l-Baha isn't infallible on a matter such as this also, if this is unacceptable to you. Myself, I think that this is probably an interpretation of Baha'u'llah's Writings, but how can I say this with certainty? You can reject the Baha'i Faith as an infallible Revelation if you want if you think Abdu'l-Baha is infallible in everything He said. You would have to if you are consistent with Baha'u'llah appointing Abdu'l-Baha as being the infallible interpreter of what Baha'u'llah said. This would be tantamount to rejecting the infallibility of Baha'u'llah. Of course, you wouldn't have to reject everything that Abdu'l-Baha and Baha'u'llah said.